* law-making powers that are held only by the Commonwealth Parliament, and only that parliament can create laws in these areas (the states cannot create law in those areas) * set out in section 51 of the Australian Constitution
example - currency, control of the armed forces and customs and excise duties
12
New cards
concurrent powers
those law-making powers that are shared by the Commonwealth and the state parliaments.
examples - taxation, banking, insurance, marriage
13
New cards
section 109
states that when a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
14
New cards
constitutional checks on parliament in law making
HERBS
high court interpretation
express rights
requirementt for double majority in referendums
bicameral structure
separation of powers
15
New cards
high court interpretation +-
the guardian of the constitution - interprets the meaning of the constitution
\+
•Judges are appointed, not elected, so can make decisions free from political pressure
•Judges are experienced and experts in Constitutional law so can bring these qualities to their decision-making
\-
•Judges are reactive and have to wait until a case is brought to them
•Judges are appointed by politicians and governments often appoint judges with leanings to wards their side of politics
cannot change the actual words of the constitution
16
New cards
express rights protection +-
P property
J jury
T trade
R religion
S state
\+
•Impose effective limits on law-making powers of the Commonwealth
•Rights can be fully enforced by the High Court, the independent judicial arm
can only be removed by a referendum
\-
only changed by referendum
limited in scope
cost of igniting court case is high
17
New cards
requirement for a double majority +-
referendum - the process that must take place in order to amend the wording of the constitution as stated in section 128
\+
•The Constitution cannot be changed without the approval of a majority of voters
•The double majority requirement protects smaller states as each state counts equally in determining whether a majority of states (four out of six) has been achieved
\-
•The public may not fully understand the proposal
•Important changes often cannot take place due to the difficulty of achieving the double majority
18
New cards
bicameral structure +-
\+
allows for scrutiny of all bills by both houses
•A Senate with large numbers of cross-benchers or opposition senators will review bills very carefully
\-
•If the Government holds a majority in both houses, the upper house is unlikely to fully scrutinise bills
•Law-making can be stalled or significant compromises may need to be made in order to pass bills. This may not reflect the will of the majority of voters
19
New cards
separation of powers +-
•A principle established by the Constitution to ensure there is no abuse of power by these bodies.
\+
•Allows executive to be scrutinised by the legislature – legislature can refuse to pass legislation sought by the executive.
•Judiciary is independent of the other two arms. This is especially important in cases where the Commonwealth is a party.
\-
there is significant overlap between the legislature and executive – ministers are in both arms. This reduces the level of scrutiny provided.
•Judges are appointed by the executive so the executive can influence the composition of the bench
\
20
New cards
high court interpretations of the australian constitution
gives meaning to the words in the Constitution
section 7 - senate
section 24 - house of representatives
21
New cards
section 128
the process of changing the words in the Australian Constitution (referendum)
22
New cards
protecting the constitution example
1999 referendum on whether aus should become a republic
23
New cards
Tasmanian dam case
the tasmanian government wanted to dam the Franklin river and claimed that the Commonwealth did not have power over environmental matters. however the Commonwealth argued that it can make laws on national concerns due to external affairs power. The high court determined that the external affairs power gave the commonwealth parliament the power to fulfil aus legal obligation under the UNESCO international treaty. shifted the residual power into exclusive